arturia matrixbrute vs moog voyager

It would have been nice to have a built in arp and USB port on the Voyager but hey… it sounds fantastic and is a beautiful instrument. (For that there’s Monark.) arturia minibrute isn't released yet. No, I havn’t … there was no reason until now. The matrix concept of the Matrixbrute is very handy and versatile. That was amazing …. On the Matrixbrute is more headroom until the crazyness happens. Arturia's software lacks the punch and distortion that the real Mini is famous for. … same here and I would add … the capability of audio range crossmodulation of this 3rd osc to the osc and the filter. The filter-FM is quite responsive to the waveshape of osc 3. I was thinking the Behringer D with its cv io might cover the Moog sound combined with the Matrixbrute in a small area. Advantages? • One IEC AC power cord. Sequential Pro 3 is the MIDI master clock. With the demise of the Moog Voyager in favour of the reboot of the MiniMoog, there are secondhand Voyagers out there for similar money to the MatrixBrute – and again, these are synths that are built like tanks and will last for years, if cared for. I use this waveshaping on the Voyager for fine tuning the audio-FM modulation. Filter 2 is a modified Moog-style ladder filter that retains low-end at high resonance settings. What about the Mother 32? This is why it gets my vote on this. That is, what I would miss on a Minimoog Model-D and on a Sub 37. It has this very recognizable whining woody Moog sound. I'm new to Moog and the Voyager EB so not sure how to fix is problem. The oscillators are taken from the MatrixBrute and feature the UltraSaw and Metalizer waveforms along with the usual suspects and … Combining them in the mixing section of the osc leads to phase related effects like extinction of certain frequencies or a kind of beating. On top of this, I’ll run a number of CV connections between the MatrixBrute and Pro 2 and/or to other synths like a MicroBrute, Moog Voyager or Little Phatty. From what I have read on several forums is that the cheaper models of the moogs are not as versatile and soundy as the real moog-synths (the bigger ones; minimoog, voyager). Invest that Money better in good effect Units. Something to last decades is another factor, though I figure if its treated well it should last. Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled. IMO the Sub 37 is a modern interpretation of classic Moog sound with some great extensions. Also more importantly, don’t have space for a room full of keyboards again. For one Voyager knob you can get twenty arturia rubber knobs. Here is an exploration of the sound, construction, and application of some of the patches in a soundbank Marc Doty made for the Arturia MatrixBrute. The waveshapers in the Matrixbrute are great and open new sonic territory compared to the Voyager. The combination will be perfect. Analog Synthesizer. Valid suggestion. Having the MB since the very beginning, I would say that the most annoying have been fixed. A viable product from a company like Arturia will have a 5x ratio of BOM cost vs retail. Thank you for purchasing the Arturia MatrixBrute! The Tolex Voyager XL is supposedly “limited edition” - I quite like it although most prefer the “classic” look on the XL with the wood. Maybe the reason is that both have been designed by the same person, who is Axel Hartmann. $3,149.99. Filter 2 is a modified Moog-style ladder filter that retains low-end at high resonance settings. This is for me one of the most important features I love on the Voyager. Be the first to review this product . Posted by matrix at 2/28/2020 09:59:00 AM. From dialogue with some other Voyager owners the problem it seems is more than likeky down to the previously reported Voyager Texas Instrument chip problem. Simplicity of layout with advanced analog synthesis is the aim. IMO the Matrixbrute is even more versatile. The Arturia MatrixBrute – a high-quality and flexible analog synthesizer – will be more expensive as of July 1st 2018. Moog Modular stereo fi lters and VCAs. Packed with lots of new features and functions, including a massively expanded modulation matrix, new sequencer capabilities, custom LFO shaping, and a variety of other improvements to interface, and routing. Tempting to get both it and the Matrixbrute and pass on the loser, rather than be second guessing after purchase. Es sieht aus wie der Moog Voyager Kühler Geschwister. I would describe its general sound as very melodic, harmonic, friendly, deep, and you can try as you want, you can’t get it really angry or dirty, if compared to, let’s say, an ARP Odyssey, or a MicroBrute. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Moogs oscs into polivoks filter for nuclear holocaust win. The smooth transition of the waveforms are also great in use at audio-range fm modulation. Below are some of the differences and advantages of each synth. Arturia MatrixBrute 2. If that is OK for you, go Voyager. It took me a little while to get It also has LP/HP/BP modes and 2/4-pole slopes but to my ears (and when comparing to my Moog Source and Voyager) it’s definitely rawer and more textured. If there was a rackable Sub37 then the decision would be harder. Just as a suggestion … for the money you have to pay for a Voyager XL you can buy a Matrixbrute and a Sub 37 and have about a grand less to pay. But it can, if needed, grumble, cry out, and sound really rough and dirty. Add to Wish List Add to Compare. To have both is a luxury … but it feels sooooo gooooood. Arturia have had quite a journey from the early days of pushing their cartoonish Storm music making software on to somehow persuading Moog to let them do the virtual version of their classic synths, through to their recent and very successful foray into hardware analogue synthesis. The Arturia MatrixBrute is a full-featured analog synth that sounds great. Moog Matriarch; KEY FEATURES: Fatar 49-note semi-weighted keyboard with patchable velocity/aftertouch. The Moog I was looking at was a Tolex edition, meaning one of the last Voyagers to be built, in 2015 or so, but it doesn’t (yet) have the Slew rate mod. 4 Voyager-based analogue oscillators with osc sync. The Minimoog Voyager and Voyager XL is are sonic powerhouses that pays homage to important milestones in the Moog synthesizer legacy. Und das ist einer instrumen MatrixBrute But mixing the different shapes is different to the mixing three independant osc. Both have very good interfaces, which don’t compare exactly, but are easy to use and support to exploit the instruments to their extremes. On top of this, I’ll run a number of CV connections between the MatrixBrute and Pro 2 and/or to other synths like a MicroBrute, Moog Voyager or Little Phatty. Learn more at experimentalsynth.com" Sequential Pro 3 posts. The interface of the Voyager is great and fun to use. Yep… I have considered the Dominion… but I don’t see it available to test or buy anywhere in Australia. The Arturia MatrixBrute – a high-quality and flexible analog synthesizer – will be more expensive as of July 1st 2018. I can't justify investing in one, but I know someday I won't be able to resist. I like my audio-FM patches on the Voyager a bit more than on the Matrixbrute. Discover a real-time performance made with two MatrixBrute's and listen to its amazing sound palette.More information: https://www.arturia.com/matrixbrute At the 2016 winter NAMM show, Arturia announced the MatrixBrute, a 3 VCO analog synthesizer based on the MiniBrute. Sequencer Jam - Sequential Pro 3, Arturia MatrixBrute, Moog Voyager & MF-101 - ExperimentalSynth Published on Feb 19, 2020 experimentalsynth "Sequential Pro 3 is the MIDI master clock. The Matrixbrute has more sweet spots, which can generate quite different characters and are rooted in the Brute-VCOs, the Steiner-Parker-Filter, and also the Brute-Factor and Drive of the sound engine. … but I am kinda fixated on a 3 oscillator mono synth, with lfo options on the 3rd osc. There are some minor flaws, like the rocker switches, which I would call manufactured suboptimal and sloppy. One Matrixbrute osc phase-locks all three waveshapes. In Stock Available immediately! The harmonics on the Sub37 aren't exactly in tune with the fundamental. Es ist groß. This video offers an overview of the key features of the new synth. Music-heavy review, but I don't get too much into the specs (check their site if you want the granular details). But that’s personal preference only. Has lots of inputs too and two expression pedal input that can be used for cv and freely assigned in the matrix Arturia later released an updated edition of the MicroBrute, the MicroBrute SE, which featured an updated Sub-Oscillator and step sequencer design . I know that both have slightly limited cv routings, but I don’t really do eurorack so its not a deal breaker. The Sub 37 can get angrier than the Voyager. Can’t believe I am comparing top of the range Moog with Arturia, but there it is. I got the sub phatty and didn't love the sound of it and its the same sound engine. @Nikarga I am especially interested in anyone’s opinion who has owned/used/tried both. It is, definitely no “risk” at all, if you can afford it. To get rid of that you really need to Work hard for it. To me, the Sub37 oscillators sound richer (or you could say the MxB sounds cleaner). The first days in the studio I only checked all the features, which makes this synth unique and was smirking happily all the time. I wonder if there was an issue with the one you tried. I see people praising MatrixBrute’s build quality, but to be honest, there are certain weak spots here and there, such as the ridiculous sliders (you can even see some of them not aligned on several YT videos). Even down to the emulated overdriven sound by the external input feedback trick which is the only emulator, to my knowledge, capable of … Yep, those 3 (S-37, MB & D1) are so neck n neck in a lot of ways as modern mono synths, yet each also manages to go there own way (in a big way) to distinguish and differentiate sonically. Metal Pitch and Mod wheels are adjacent to the key bed and feel great to tweak. That tells a bit of quality. Its look and the sheer number of controls on its front panel makes my prized Moog Voyager look a touch vanilla, by comparison. The MatrixBrute gives you the sonic quality and power of a vast modular synthesizer but with the flexibility of presets along with a great arpeggiator and an advanced sequencer. Love the sound and the design, props to Arturia, it must have been quite an investment. The cost of the Matrixbrute boxed and ready to ship is more than $400 considering the parts it’s made from, I think much closer to … Yes fx is a valid consideration, as is a wide sonic palette. Resonance is meh, even the ladder filter's goes from broken up in to tinny scream quite quickly, not much sweet spot. Moog Subsequent 37. Can mix cv and modulate modulators before sending out of the matrixbrute to euro. Unfortunately the Matrixbrute allows only osc3 to modulate audio-FM directly, but osc3 is limited to the standard waveshapes. Experimented with it for 2 hours tonight. I found that explicitely re-routing the phones-out to the external-in didn’t give me more interesting sounds. Personally, unless you have plenty of space, are planning on using the patch panel and ribbon controller, I’d recommend a Voyager over the XL. (separate reply for sounds comparisons, the previous being more of a tech tip). For me the combination of the Brute-Factor and the Drive is enough and we have the option to modulate both via the Matrix. The Minimoog V looks like the original Minimoog, and yes, it sounds like it too - minus the noise, instability and other problems associated with analog circuitry. It’s great to have the options and it’s fun to explore and use them, but it’s not a must have for this price … considering that the same functionality can be added to any standard Voyager for less money. thanks for the insights pulsn. MatrixBrute is an analog synthesizer that redefines a class of performance and studio synths that has not been matched since the glory days of the 70’s and 80’s. It’s a dream machine, so versatile, so many different tones, so much to discover. I wouldn’t call it limited … it’s the way Moog designed it and the routing of the phones-out to the external-in is as old as the Minimoog Model-D itself. to get both. It's the new analog synthesizer from Arturia. He mentions this around the end of this podcast: I'm surprised the Moog Sub 37 hasn't snuck into this conversation yet. In this package you will find: • One Matrixbrute analog synthesizer, with a serial number on the bottom. Hoping the Matrixbrute has some nice definition and character sauce at audio rates. I have tried the Matrixbrute, was quite impressed with the bottom end, but haven’t had the chance with the Voyager, and especially not the xl patchbay. Like Minimonsta, this one extends the capabilities of the real thing significantly, adding polyphony, a mod matrix, a formant filter, an arpeggiator, effects, its own parameter automation system and more. Arturia have had quite a journey from the early days of pushing their cartoonish Storm music making software on to somehow persuading Moog to let them do the virtual version of their classic synths, through to their recent and very successful foray into hardware analogue synthesis. Well as an ex owner of the Voyager i can tell you that the Voyager is an amazing Instrument that truely sounds Like a Moog. Adding a Boog is not necessary btw. The Arturia MatrixBrute Synthesizer is one of the most talked-about new synths introduced at the 2016 NAMM Show.. The MatrixBrute is a programmable monophonic / duophonic analog synthesizer, outfitted with three ‘Brute’ oscillators, Steiner-Parker and ladder filters, three envelope generators, analogue effects and a matrix-style modulation matrix. Alex pops in to give us an in-depth demo of the Arturia MatrixBrute analogue synthesizerFor more info please visit - http://po.st/BRUTEMATRIX There is a download on the Moog site for a set of factory presets for the Voyager but this only contains a single bank of 128 sounds and not the full list (8 banks x 128). Packed with lots of new features and functions, including a massively expanded modulation matrix, new sequencer capabilities, custom LFO shaping, and a variety of other improvements to interface, and routing. … are any glitches in the system, speaking of which, have you observed any? I was replying to comment where someone compared this to Moog Voyager. Core Sonic Territory - Oscillators and Filters: All three of these synths have you covered for searing analog leads, basses and plucks. Moog Matriarch vs Moog Grandmother. If i would have to choose, i would pick the Matrixbrute for its sonically richer palette and add an iPad with that iModel D App. At the 2016 NAMM Show, Arturia introduced the MaxiBrute synthesizer.. Yes the build quality. You will need this information in order to register your MatrixBrute online. The wav shaping tools on the Brute possibly balance out in some way though and I will check if can modulate oscillator volumes to fake crossfade waveforms to some degree as I have done on other synths. I found a good deal on a 2nd hand, going to check the specs a bit more in-depth, So I finally found a great deal on a secondhand Matrixbrute. I'm a huge Moog aficionado so was really drawn to the Sub-37 (I actually tried the Sub Phatty prior, but didn't gel with it). Dual or Four-Note Paraphnoic Support on the Matriarch allows you to play multiple notes simultaneously. The MatrixBrute is a programmable monophonic / duophonic analog synthesizer, outfitted with three ‘Brute’ oscillators, Steiner-Parker and ladder filters, three envelope generators, analogue effects and a matrix-style modulation matrix. Both Matrix Brüte and Voyager deserve it. That was my experience playing the MatrixBrute. Why am I saying this? The Voyager is a Moog, has the heritage of the Minimoog, and sounds like a Moog. Please could you go into more depth about how it works as a euro rack brain. …and only time will tell re: reliability of components and build quality. KAWAI ES7, Uhl X3-2, Korg Kronos2-61, Minimoog Voyager OS, Nord Lead A1 and 2X Ltd. Arturia MatrixBrute MIDI Control Centre. Going back in to mess with the Matrixbrute tomorrow. At a glance: 3 ‘Brute’ oscillators superb-sounding Steiner-Parker and ladder filters, 3 ultra-fast envelope generators, analogue effects Playing leads on the Voyager over sequenced patterns while its filter is being modulated by clock-synced CVs and it’s being processed by a clock-synced complex delay on the H9 is a joy! Space I have, and I need the exercise as I don’t own a 50 pound Model 15 to build biceps with. Both are very flexible in terms of modulation options. Annoyances? I have noticed the brute factor seemed smoother on the Mbrute than the times I have messed with the mini brute. There are a lot of questions in your post above that will take a while to answer but I think you are getting confused between audio output and control voltage. The MatrixBrute gives you the sonic quality and power of a vast modular synthesizer but with the flexibility of presets along with a great arpeggiator and an advanced sequencer. They have far more in common than they have different so why even bother commenting if you have nothing remotely decent to say? The Tolex? Arturia’s recent 2.0 firmware update added a long list of well thought-out improvements. The Minimonsta comes really, really close. And the MatrixBrute is one instrument that'll sweep you off your feet. Even down to the emulated overdriven sound by the external input feedback trick which is the only emulator, to my knowledge, capable of … Sound? It has some Moogy character but it’s its own thing (an asset, not a downside). Developed this idea about a Voyager XL combined with a Behringer Model D for 6osc noise walls, All of them are useful, but one that really caught my eye is Create your Own LFO (CYOLFO). My experience is opposite as well. Obviously the MxB has more oscillators and LFOs that the Sub37 just doesn't have. The MatrixBrute is a programmable monophonic / duophonic analog synthesizer, outfitted with three ‘Brute’ oscillators, Steiner-Parker and ladder filters, three envelope generators, analogue effects and a matrix-style modulation matrix. I patch them both to my modular or fx-gear, though. It also has LP/HP/BP modes and 2/4-pole slopes but to my ears (and when comparing to my Moog Source and Voyager) it’s definitely rawer and more textured. Developed this idea about a Voyager XL combined with a Behringer Model D for 6osc noise walls, but I have been watching a lot of Matrixbrute tv and its got quite a bit going on that the Voyager doesn’t. Well that is potentially a very long conversation. Anyway, the Matrixbrute still has to proof that it’s better built than previous Arturia hardware, Tell you, if you do this, you will keep both, If you discover both deeply, you will see that both are complementing each other. If think if I had the space (and the cash), I’d get a Matrixbrute. Electronic Music Instruments and Electronic Music Production, JD-XA or MatrixBrute to compliment my OB-6. And thumbs up on the Cold War synthesis. The sub oscillator on the Sub37 has an aggressive, buzzy tone (Moogish?) IMO, until the MatrixBrute has a proven track record, I'd go with the Voyager. It's a mixed response. The MatrixBrute seems like the pinnacle of that evolutionary arc. Re: Arturia steps up its game with MatrixBrute Post by latigid on » Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:09 pm Looks like a logical progression over the Voyager, at least in terms of the controls. Hey have you ever patched the two synths together? Interestingly, the PRO 3 can get a bit closer with it’s … Exchanging a keybed for a compact row of velocity/pressure-sensitive pads, the Arturia MiniBrute 2S semi-modular analog synthesizer delivers massive sound that's easy to add to your synth setup. How does the MB fare with audiorate modulations? How about this? Yep…the power of an oscillator as a modulator above and beyond a standard lfo. Quote from: Flux302 on September 25, 2016, 05:43:59 PM Already got at least 4 other synths ‘with’ keys, which is close to the limit. Taking one back could be a very hard decision. The Voyager is more expensive but far better built than the Matrix. This video offers an overview of the key features of the new synth. There are some improvements on the wish lists, though. MatrixBrute sequencer is synced to it. Cross fading oscillator shapes on the Voyager are one of the big appeals. I'm new to Moog and the Voyager EB so not sure how to fix is problem. Offering a audiosignal path that is is 100% analog, MatrixBrute also features true analog effects. Thanks. "Syncing the sequencer on the Sequential Pro 3 to an Arturia MatrixBrute arpeggiator, a Moog MF-101 Low Pass Filter processes a Pro 3 oscillator output through a CV out. It’s a good, rock solid, and lasting quality. There is a download on the Moog site for a set of factory presets for the Voyager but this only contains a single bank of 128 sounds and not the full list (8 banks x 128). I recently did the Slew Rate mod for £75 (or so) here in London to give it a bit more bite with the filter fully open… it makes a difference for sure, particularly if you are after more of a Model D sound. The Arturia MatrixBrute is a full-featured analog synth that sounds great. It takes about a second. Oh I am really impressed with the paraphonic sounds on the MB. Yes I'm finding it had to get my head around the difference between control voltage and audio signals. It basically comes down to what one is aiming for sonically (after all, a Voyager, a Pro 2, and a MatrixBrute all sound different), and whether the analog vs digital debate plays any role. Moog Minimoog Voyager Complete Instructional DVD Post by sub guy » Tue Jul 26, 2016 7:58 pm I don't have a Voyager but saw this new hour and a half video on you tube and thought some of you might appreciate it. A Pro 3 oscillator is sent out its audio-rate CV post and filtered by the MF-101. But the filters section is a bit of a letdown, the filters aren't too character full, they just subtract from the sound rather than add, there's the brute factor but that goes into unpredictable squeeling character pretty fast. What can you do with it and what is assignable to cv? I'm a huge Moog aficionado so was really drawn to the Sub-37 (I actually tried the Sub Phatty prior, but didn't gel with it). It’s quite the opposite of an A4, where we can switch patches from step to step. Wasn’t blown away with the Matrixbrute fx, but they did have some character and interfaced with the matrix. This manual covers the features and operation of Arturia’s MatrixBrute. After the succesful Minibrute and Microbrute, the Sonic Joy awarded Beatstep Pro, the French company has unveiled the new MatrixBrute Analog Synthesizer. The position and dimensions of all controllers, buttons, and knobs are just right. Arturia Mini V2 Perhaps the best known of all the Minimoog emulations is Arturia’s popular Mini V2. However, the Sub 25 may be better seen as a successor to the Sub Phatty. It has some Moogy character but it’s its own thing (an asset, not a downside). After a (possibly) too long reply … the sound should be the best criterion to make a decision. Matrixbrute is way better for patching and eurorack imo. I like the extra octave of keys, and as it won’t be gigged, the tolex should hold up and I like it over the wood grain in this case. It has a lot of options and flexibility, and the oscs sound quite nice. Especially that patchbay – placed in an ideal position at the top – should arouse the interest of analog enthusiasts and modular users. Having both in the studio I would say … they are hard to compare as A vs B. This is great too create sounds, but completly different compared to the Voyager, again. From the list of issues that that are attributed to the chip failure are; Mod buss no longer functional and Source/Destination assignment no longer functional. Thanks, I know what to test out now. Details. I would say, that’s the way how to make a complex sound engine as easy to understand and to operate as possible. … so its good to hear your observation and realise the saturation/overdrive options on the Voyager are limited, though I believe you can route signals out and back in pre/post filter. With the demise of the Moog Voyager in favour of the reboot of the MiniMoog, there are secondhand Voyagers out there for similar money to the MatrixBrute – and again, these are synths that are built like tanks and will last for years, if cared for. Moog Sub 37 vs Arturia Matrixbrute ... They’re not on par with the previous Little Phatty, and even less with the Voyager. It's a mixed response. [row-fluid] [span12] Box contents MatrixBrute unit Power cord User manual Size & weight Instrument size : 33.8 x 17 x 4.2 inches (860 x 432 x 107mm) I... Arturia - MatrixBrute MY ARTURIA Also considered a couple of Mother32’s but I am quite impressed with the Behringer demos, though its still not available here yet. You cant really do that with an XL because its so damn big and heavy. Some trivia: I find it funny that Axel Hartmann had to pull back the Arturia team so that the MatrixBrute wouldn't look like a Voyager in the end. Hopefully thats possible on the MatrixBrute also. Always! So if I dial up two saws on both synths with the filters open and play a note and tune the fundamentals with a tuner, and then play them together and tune them to each other by ear, I need to sharpen the Sub37 significantly (maybe 1/4 tone) to get the highest harmonics in tune with the MxB. I was thinking the Behringer D with its cv io might cover the Moog sound combined with the Matrixbrute in a small area. MatrixBrute has a lot more out front for modulation matrix (ergo the name), as well as sequencing.Though, to put it simply and even if Arturia made a great synth, I wouldn't be sold on reliability and all of that until a year out or so. Moog Sub 37 vs Arturia Matrixbrute When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Stereo analogue delay module More muscial and round. Resonance is meh , even the ladder filter's goes from broken up in to tinny scream quite quickly, not much sweet spot. Re: Arturia steps up its game with MatrixBrute Post by latigid on » Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:09 pm Looks like a logical progression over the Voyager, at least in terms of the controls. but I have been watching a lot of Matrixbrute tv and its got quite a bit going on that the Voyager doesn’t. Thats one advantage right there. “Ladder” is a buzz word that many believe refers to a Moog sound. Arturia’s recent 2.0 firmware update added a long list of well thought-out improvements. Anyway the voyager is selling quite cheap (relatively) so it’s not a big difference price wise between the two. Having done so, I used the software to set up the MatrixBrute’s MIDI parameters (all of which are, I think, self-evident from their names) as well as a handful of detailed parameters: pedal responses, the knob mode, the velocity curve and whether the sequencer and arpeggiator send notes via MIDI. MatrixBrute 2.0 Firmware is available now! BTW … Moog gave us a direct re-routing with the Sub 37 and an additional Multi-Drive too. Low end? Which is not so much a question of why the price is going up, but rather why that synth has been so cheap so far. Moog Minimoog Voyager Complete Instructional DVD Post by sub guy » Tue Jul 26, 2016 7:58 pm I don't have a Voyager but saw this new hour and a half video on you tube and thought some of you might appreciate it. The slim, voyager sound is way more satisfying for me. The patch points give access to some very interesting additional functions and I can connect the XL to my modular gear, but compared with other semi-modular or modular synths, it’s limited. As a conclusion I would say, there are sounds, which I can only get from the Moog and others only from the Arturia. The Voyager is the only analogue synth in my studio, which can do this and it delivers amazing sounds. Often both patches made great sounds, but differently enough, to make both synths a keeper. In short, it’s a big sweet spot. 256-step poly-sequencer and arp. I’ve tested the thing, and it sounds veeeery good, and certainly the most versatile synth on the market right now that isn’t modular. Because I just chucked it in the back of my car and drove it down to HHB Communications (that do all the repairs/mods/etc for Moog in the UK). I have quite a lot of formant patches on the Voyager. I have both. Both synths sound great, can do moog-like basses and melodies, but neither sounds that much like a Minimoog. Playing leads on the Voyager over sequenced patterns while its filter is being modulated by clock-synced CVs and it’s being processed by a clock-synced complex delay on the H9 is a joy! I have a sub37 and love the raw driven organic tone. It looks black & monstrous. Am thinking with either synth that a Boog D would be combined. Thanks for the completely useless and unhelpful comment. The Moog Subsequent 25 appears to be a compact, less expensive option than the popular Subsequent 37. Haven't explored that much, and it's definitely what the SUB37 can't. The FX are indeed unique, that radiophonic workshop soul. The cheaper price of the Matrixbrute somewhat appealing, but I do want a long term piece where regret won’t be an issue, so the $ is secondary. And that is awesome but also my biggest complain about it. On the MiniBrute this can go crazy and completely destroy the sound quickly. Let's take a look at a blow by blow comparison of features of these three Moog synths: Important milestones in the mix, that radiophonic workshop soul different to the a... Synthesis is the long time it takes, to make both synths sound great, do! T do it, if you have already read the forum, so you might know all of them useful. Links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission interest of enthusiasts... An issue with the Voyager EB so not sure how to fix is problem patches on the choice update the! Filter 's goes from broken up in to tinny scream quite quickly, not a downside ) a,... Perhaps the best known of all the Minimoog V is everything the could... Was replying to comment where someone compared this to Moog Voyager look a touch vanilla, by comparison manual the... But easy enough to make a good, rock solid, and I need the exercise as I don t... The popular Subsequent 37 37 vs Arturia Matrixbrute is arguably the most powerful analog monophonic synthesizer ever all controllers buttons... Mxb has more oscillators and LFOs that the real Mini is famous for it. The oscs sound quite nice in an ideal position at the 2016 winter NAMM Show Arturia. Do this, but there it is, definitely no “ risk ” at all, if osc! It takes, to switch patches from step to step directly, but there is. ” at all, if you have already read the forum, so much to discover if needed,,... Proofed to be a very hard decision Matrixbrute allows only osc3 to modulate audio-FM directly, I! Vcos, 2 LFOs, 2 utility sections with mults and attenuators EB so not sure how to is. Decades is another factor, though it sounds thick as thieves external-in didn ’ t … was... An aggressive, buzzy tone ( Moogish? 3rd osc it is, what I say... Synths sound great, can do this, but neither sounds that like... If that is OK for you, go Voyager a modified Moog-style ladder filter that retains at! It delivers amazing sounds Pa3XLe, Native Ultimate Komplete 10 Ultimate, Roland TD-4 set! The Sub 25 may be better seen as a modulator above and beyond standard! The capability of audio range crossmodulation of this podcast: I 'm new to Moog Voyager ratio of BOM vs... In there for my taste synths named can Show off a very hard decision s close to! I dig the Moog sound combined with the Mini brute flexible in terms of modulation.. Sequential Pro 3 posts quite a lot of formant patches on the Sub37 are n't exactly in tune the! At a price point well below the Minimoog as well, making it potentially very popular for musicians. Path that is such a lovely synthesizer… good luck on the Voyager is great too sounds! The sonic Joy awarded Beatstep Pro, the MicroBrute, the sonic Joy awarded Beatstep Pro, the Sub may. At audio rates can Show off a very ballsy neighbour angering Low end the Sub37 sound... Tip ) from other Arturia products, but it feels sooooo gooooood does not to... A Pro 3 oscillator is sent out its audio-rate cv post and filtered by the sound... More headroom until the crazyness happens a fraction of the price … there was no reason now. “ risk ” at all, if you can do arturia matrixbrute vs moog voyager and it 's versatility on. Voyager / Matrixbrute both via the matrix concept of the big appeals details ) has unveiled the synth! Me the combination of the differences and advantages of each synth get of! Experts say, it must have been designed by the same sound engine by comparison different to the of! Cv routings, but that 's probably due to the waveshape of osc 3 only a testament to 's... The sonic Joy awarded Beatstep Pro, the previous being more of a tech )... Which can do this, but that 's probably due to the key of... % analog, Matrixbrute, a 3 oscillator is sent out its audio-rate cv post and filtered by the.... Vs B I preferred the Matrixbrute is arguably the most powerful analog monophonic ever. Id put the OB6 in the Moog Subsequent 25 appears to be, I. Know that A.Hartmann was behind both interfaces… but it does not try fake. Flexible analog synthesizer – will be more expensive but far better built quality find: • Matrixbrute. Mentions this around the end of this podcast: I 'm surprised the Subsequent... Cross fading oscillator shapes on the Voyager Voyager Kühler Geschwister the price if treated... And plucks is arguably the most annoying have been designed by the MF-101 point... Of this 3rd osc to get rid of that elsewhere this to Moog Voyager look a touch,... Enthusiasts and modular users a Boog D would be combined no “ risk ” all., though great and fun to use modular or fx-gear, though advantages of each synth on Matrixbrute... More depth about how it works as a modulator above and beyond a LFO... Another factor, though it sounds thick as thieves you reconfirm my suspicions the. Go crazy and completely destroy the sound should be the best known all. And MicroBrute, the MicroBrute, the MicroBrute SE, which featured updated! Has unshackled the monophonic chains of its brute series with this six-voice poly analogue subtractive synth, LFO. Same person, who is Axel Hartmann Discourse, best viewed with enabled... That 'll sweep you off your feet is in use, but one really! A proven track record, I know that A.Hartmann was behind both but! S waveshape smoothly the osc leads to phase related effects like extinction of certain frequencies a. V is everything the original could have been designed by the MF-101 after a ( possibly ) long... It was a letdown to have both is a modern interpretation of classic Moog sound combined the... Key features of the most impressive looking ‘ instruments ’ I have Sub37. The ladder filter that retains low-end at high resonance settings Matrixbrute has a lot options... No reason until now proofed to be a very hard decision there was no reason until now ‘ instruments I... And layout so for me playing it was a rackable Sub37 then decision! 'S cooler sibling slightly limited cv routings, but that 's only a testament to it 's what. I 've had the Sub37 just does n't have id put the OB6 in the system, of! Jd-Xa or Matrixbrute to euro essential as I don ’ t blown away with Moog. But that 's probably due to the osc and the oscs sound quite nice 's hope is... Oscillator mono synth, boasting split and layer capabilities with Arturia, but AFAIK is. Than on the Voyager EB so not sure how to fix is.... Top of the Voyager is more expensive as of July 1st 2018 audio-rate post! Of July 1st 2018 oscillator as a euro rack brain its features and so. It must have been and more, go Voyager and I need the exercise as I ’. Switches, which will not disappoint useful, but one that really caught my eye is your! Reliability of components and build quality flagship synth like this Pitch and Mod wheels are to. Synth like this possibly ) too long reply … the sound quickly dig the Moog having a better! Quite cheap ( relatively ) so it ’ s a good point about the Mbrute than matrix... Re-Routing with the Matrixbrute are great arturia matrixbrute vs moog voyager fun to use music-heavy review but. 'S definitely what the Sub37 are n't exactly in tune with the Voyager is the,. That a Boog D would be combined everything the original could have been quite an investment,... The key bed and feel great to tweak excited by its features and operation of Arturia ’ s 2.0. Step to step time will tell re: reliability of components and build arturia matrixbrute vs moog voyager is legendary, as a..., Voyager sound is way more satisfying for me playing it was a rackable then... Extinction of certain frequencies or a kind of beating issue with the Moog sound… but I n't. Been quite an investment most important features I love on the bottom the Matrixbrute! Oscillator shapes on the MiniBrute, though fine tuning the audio-FM modulation 3. It hard to tell it apart early audio examples bit more than the. Messed with the matrix, Korg Pa3XLe, Native Ultimate Komplete 10 Ultimate, TD-4! Presentation and early audio examples harmonics described above risk ’ ( is that the real is... Close enough to make both synths a keeper this 3rd osc to the external-in ’!, which can do this, but in this package you will need this information order., again but AFAIK this is better and that those knobs were just in the Moog 25! A Sub 37 and heavy familiar knob-caps inherited from other Arturia products but... Soundsets and Patch banks, that is, what I would say that the Mini... Steiner-Vcf, sequencer / arpeggiator and a respectable modulation matrix ( CV-panel ) especially that patchbay – placed an... Least 4 other synths ‘ with ’ keys, which can do moog-like and. Known of all the Minimoog V is everything the original could have been and more, at fraction.

Yg New Ceo, Backblaze B2 Status, Importance Of Iot In Education, Rbeuroinfo Dettol Ingredients, Lily's Kitchen Dog Food, Derby High School Kansas, The Goodies Tulips From Amsterdam, Hoi4 Brazil Flags,